Nikon 20083 Black NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S
$10,203,040,506,071,000.00
Last updated on February 24, 2025 2:39 am Details
- Fast 50mm prime for Z Mirrorless cameras
- Uncanny f/1.8 performance, extreme sharpness and virtually zero distortion
- New ultra-quiet stepping motor for silent focusing
- Beautiful bokeh and superior Low-light performance
- 5-Axis Dual detect optical VR powered by Z cameras. Maximum Reproduction Ratio is 0.15x
Specification: Nikon 20083 Black NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S
|
13 reviews for Nikon 20083 Black NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S
Show all
Most Helpful
Highest Rating
Lowest Rating
Add a review
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bac9/2bac93bc1c8ec6de2d900f7aead7b3687ec4eaa4" alt="Nikon 20083 Black NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S"
Nikon 20083 Black NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S
$10,203,040,506,071,000.00
Doctor Fab –
The best 85 ever made by Nikon
S. Miles –
Nikon’s long awaited 85/1.8 prime for the Z-series is finally shipping and I’m happy to report it’s been worth the wait. Design and build are as expected based on the existing f/1.8 series primes, which is to say relatively light and compact in a decent, if unremarkable, composite casing. AF is fast and accurate and the lens balances very nicely on my Z7. Image quality, as hoped, excels. The lens is tack sharp wide open right across frame. On testing, I can detect a very slight bump in sharpness at f/2.8 in the extreme corners on a planar subject (brick wall). But this is only detectable by making painstaking comparisons at the pixel level. You would never notice it in real world shooting. Simply choose your aperture, focus on any part of the frame at any distance and prepare to be amazed. It’s all here. Biting (but not clinical) sharpness from wide open. Exquisite detail at the plane of focus. Beautiful creamy background blur. Smooth transitions. And exceptional colour purity, which is probably down to the remarkable lack of colour fringing, even on out-of-focus highlights. It all adds up to ‘that look’ which only the best short telephoto lenses have: that beguiling combination of sharp details and glowing highlights against a soft wash of colour, all balanced in perfect harmony. The lens is just as well behaved on stopping down. Depth of field simply increases, untroubled as far as I can tell by any significant focus shift or field curvature, just as you expect and just as you want. No unpleasant surprises. Complaints? If pushed, I would say it doesn’t focus quite as close I would like but, in fairness, that’s true of every 85mm prime I’ve ever used. It’s just how it is. Some will say it should have been f/1.4. Not me. Not when it’s half the size and weight of those ‘hero’ lenses. Not when the rendering is this good. I pair mine with the equally exceptional 14-30/4 zoom, which on my Z7 makes for a fantastic two lens kit for travel and backpacking. Highly recommended.
E. A. Johnson –
Though I have the 24-70/2.8 I bought the 50/1.8 mainly to use with extension tubes in situations where I don’t care about field curvature. It’s a fantastic lens by itself and I’ve had good results with the extension tube. To my eyes results on the extension tube are notably better than with the 24-70/2.8 particularly with respect to the bokeh. I also like that it is comparatively light and cheap. I will probably always take this in my kit to have a lens for ultimate resolution and for use with an extension tube for macro work (flowers, insects) until a native macro lens becomes available for the Z series.
Richard from Toronto –
This is easily one of the best 50mm lenses Nikon has ever made and rivals the more expensive Zeiss OTUS 55mm lens. There is a special quality to the pictures this lens can create. The way your in focus subject pops out at the maximum apertures is quite beautiful which makes this lens a wonderful choice for available light portraits (although I normally prefer a longer focal length). The focus is nice and quick and probably quicker than the 50/1.8G AF-S (definitely much faster than the 501.4G AF-S). This lens is priced 2-3 times more than a typical lens of this type but I think it’s well worth the money given the superior results. If you find this a useful focal length and aperture it’s really a no brainer in my mind.
Spass an der Freude –
Mag sein, dass das Z-Objektiv im Vergleich zu einfacheren Objektiv-Konstruktionen etwas hochpreisig ist, allerdings hat z.B. das Sigma Art 35 bei Erscheinen genauso viel gekostet.
Dafür bekommt man im Vergleich zum Sigma Art (das ich auch besitze):
1. Einen Autofokus der, sehr schnell und sehr leise, immer und überall sitzt
2. Ein Objektiv das für die hohe Abbildungsleistung/Schärfe sehr leicht ist
3. Eine hervorragende Abbildungsleistung schon bei Offenblende
4. Bei Offenblende schon scharf bis an den Rand (keine Bildfeldwölbung!)
5. Es besitzt fast keine Verzeichnung
6. Ein sehr schönes Bokeh
7. Eine unglaubliche Naheinstellungsgrenze
8. Ein natives Objektiv für das Z-System
Ich verwende das Objektiv an meiner Nikon Z 7 und bin sehr zufrieden damit. Was man dem Objektiv negativ ankreiden könnte, wäre ein relativ hoher Lichtabfall am Rand (Vignettierung) bei Offenblende. Ich gehöre allerdings zu den Fotografen, die eine hohe Vignettierung lieben und als Gestaltungsmittel einsetzen, also freue ich mich auch darüber. 🙂
Wer nicht auf jeden Euro schauen muss und ein lichtstarkes, hochwertiges 35er sucht, kommt nicht daran vorbei. Ob 1.4 oder 1.8 in diesem Fall wichtig ist, muss jeder für sich entscheiden. Beispielbilder (alle bei 1.8, RAW in JPG mit Capture NX-D konvertiert) anbei: 1.Motiv mit Fokus auf Bildmitte. 2. Motiv Naheinstellung. 3. Katze geht immer!
Wind freak –
Yes, this is rather expensive for an 85/1.8, but:
a)it’s a genuine Nikon
b)it’s pretty compact and solid. Handles really nicely with the FC.
c)AF is blazingly fast
d)at least for my usage (portraiture) – this lens is borderline too sharp – even wide open. I don’t recall having to dial back on texture as much with any of my other lenses
Dalton –
It’s sharp, focuses reasonably fast, MUCH lighter than the F2.8 version while being cheaper. Also the kit lens for the Z7 for a reason… it is REALLY sharp and it shows that it was made for a camera with more than 24 Megapixels. Only F4 aperture though but it is lighter than the F2.8, not sure if the F2.8 version will focus faster (i.e faster focus motors) but it seems ok day to day where I’m not missing shots due to actuator speed but instead to my misplacement of the focus point.
Folds up tight which some love and some hate… I think the F2.8 version does not do that which would explain why there is a size difference.
It’s not bad I just wish Nikon offered this with the Z5 rather than the junky plastic kit lens they offer with the Z5 considering this is offered on the Z6 and fully compatible with the Z5 it would make a far better and sharper impression than the junky 24-50 f4-6 they do offer. Buying this standalone is not cheap and offering this as a kit for the Z5 would be really nice like they do for the Z6 but I guess they are not doing that as much.
Alex –
Don’t get me wrong this is the best lens I have ever used (I have only used a Nikkor 17-55mm 2.8, nikkor 50mm 1.8, sigma 17-50mm2.8). There are some fringing though as you can see by the hair on the pictures. The photo was edited to remove some of it.
Roderick Field –
It seems a bit extreme but the new Nikon Z system is such a stride in image quality combining superb lenses and ibis. Between the two it’s hard to get bad pictures in any light if you have a speck of talent. As the only prime lens available (Dec 2018) I’ve used this lens a lot and love it – ridiculously sharp with amazing bokeh wide open, pictures really pop.
Mr P Stewardson –
I will say up front, I don’t normally shoot primes. But I decided to invest in some for my Z6 as the kit lens at f4 limited some shots I wanted.
Right out of the box it looks and feels like all the other S lenses. Not too heavy, quality construction, everything you could hope for. But it’s the image quality that stunned me. For 15+ years I’ve carried a Nikon DSLR and a zoom lens, for many years a 24-70/2.8 lens. I’ve always bought primes but never used them much at all. These S lens are different, I’ve pretty much completely switched to using primes!
The sharpness, speed, and quietness are talked about a lot. Obviously all stellar but there is a very difficult to describe image feel to the S primes. Yup they’re ‘only’ f1.8 lenses, but having used 1.4 f mount lenses I’m not missing anything at all. You can shoot these S primes wide open at 1.8 all day and the quality is stunning.
I recently traded in my 24-70/4s kit lens for the f2.8s version. But I’m still finding I prefer to shoot with the prime lenses. The 35mm being one of the 3 I pretty much carry everywhere now. If you have a Z6/7 get yourself some of the primes, they’re definitely worth it.
krieber2 –
The lens seems great and as expected! Nice bokeh. Only docked one star because it appears to be Australian from the warranty. Which I don’t think affects the warranty but if buying in North America it would be expected to get one intended for North America I think? Also Amazon can’t even be bothered to use any packing materials for a $900+ purchase. No added protection at all. Mind blowing.
mockbeggar –
This is the most sharpest 1.8 35mm you can buy it beats all other Nikon’s ,sigma art lens and canon it is well built and weather sealed.
I am a profession photographer and have tested it in all conditions. Pay no attention to utube click baits and people who say it costs too much, you will be paying for one of best built sharpest plus other optical qualities you can buy and I have had 40 years of testing lenses and am a canon shooter. Well done Nikon for taking us into the real digital photographic age.
Jim –
Bought this lens slightly used and was disappointed with the sharpness. I could not tell any difference from my Nikon 50mm f1.8 so returned this lens. I could not justify the extra $500 over my nifty fifty. This lens is also much larger and heavier than the nifty 50 -even with the mount adapter attached to my z6.